Does Hot Cheetos Cause Cancer

ANARCHISM "IS?

Mexico Jan. 1994, an Indian uprising sweeping the world, appearing as an armed movement than existing ones. Experience threw the old Marxist analysis of the area, which by the rapid succession of events, began to be irrelevant or even contradictory or useless even for many of the old intellectual hatched Mexico 68 as well as some newcomers to academic work. The uprising of the EZLN and its future actions in the years to come, would pulling step, the heavybricks left at least two generations of Soviet Marxism. Or in appearance, seemed to happen that way.

The struggles of view from the "real" socialism, had allegedly intended to be an early demise. Process carried out by the forces of progress, which eventually end up finishing with the community and would enter the ranks of the industrial proletariat, where only and only then would become useful in the fight against big business or under a more optimistic view, could become part of the proletariat, where communities supiendo reality today.

irrefutable evidence

history as Lenin said have left some firsts in Marxism as a top-down hierarchies, the lead or anything related to the construction workers' party, of elements that lead to humanity whole towards their emancipation with honey and chips, proposals marginalized by the actions of the newest social movements. This fact is manifested by the quasi-apology from one part of the intelligentsia, which recognizes its mistakes and pass thrown to the dustbin of history, the Western world as a whole.

Others, due to the situation presented them to the victory of socialism in the XXI century, began to regainementos who saw it as inadequate, but together with different current values, which have generated the movements. While others try to shape a neo-Marxism that seek to adjust to the neo-neo-activism movement, neo-anti-capitalists. Everything is new for most social scientists linked to movements, avoid the seizure of state power, horizontal and avant-garde as an evil. This had never been seen in the eyes of the Marxist sociologist, these items are new in Western cosmology, is not it?.

THE REVENGE OF

Anarchism Anarchism, since beforeprevious proposal was quickly crossed by social democrats, communists and social Christians, as unworkable or petty bourgeois, and who despised the powers and organizational methods of the state. However, the anarchist ideal was widely accepted in large labor movements, which allowed him to develop and carry out collective organizations of workers, peasants or people close to the

idea that would cost even it was for short periods , realize that world "impossible."

Peter Kropotkin (exponent of importance during the nineteenth century, anarcho-communist current) an imbecile to anyone that since &; Aacute; ndon the various obstacles that faced the anarchist vision. Where no doubt the Russian revolution (early twentieth century) provides an example of the damage, which can generate an authoritarian social movements since the Bolshevik party led the soviets (workers councils and autonomous farmers) to a process of institutionalization to be part of his vision of state workers, eliminating weapons decree and the independent work of the working people and creating bureaucratic reforms that would lead to future failure the USSR, we all know, experience is lacking, add, the difficulty of the working classes to take a postura adamant about their future and the failure of anarchists to be overwhelmed by a libertarian movement that was ironic since its inception.

In what was the Russian experience, we can add more historical events like the English civil war and student movements of 68, however does not seem necessary, since the Russian revolution has in his process a common scenario, where ideologies end up carrying out their respective projects. Failures if for decades fueled the idea of the victory of capitalism and the need to generate real socialism ,

did not prevent the continuation of the ideathe present day.

At the present time, when the left "serious" forces us to look at the efforts of the Bolivarian revolution and XXI century socialism, anarchism as a proposal remains true to its commitment to freedom, not conforms to remove the sharp corners of the current system, but it is in his folly by building a different society than the existing structures of state and the corporation. Is to anarchism, his commitment to social change root, which makes him an ideology of the people.

DEMONS OF ANARCHISM

prof is importantundizar in reflection of what is today led to a stream as complex as anarchism to be marginalized within the social movements, because if it is a comprehensive proposal is likewise proposed a structure without general, which is open on your frown to receive all kinds of ideas, many of which have been detrimental to the influence of anarchism itself.

Those who were the first to call themselves anarchists, were the working classes and peasants during the social upheavals suffered by France in the eighteenth century came to pass for his commitment to the whole society. Utopia, the other possible world is expressed differentlya constant in the history of the libertarian movement and demons come to engender difficult to bury.

An example of their harmful influence in recent generations that genre to some extent within the neo-liberal hyenas, taking individual action as the only valid to generate coexistence and reached the end state, that private property even on the air or water was the most appropriate way of managing resources, where there is no limit to the accumulation or a hindrance to exploit others, if individually accept exploitation (clearly), in other words generated the desire of the capitalists, for a world without this controlsuch, where supply and demand were the main element of living.

While for the men in suits and Freedman freedom, convenience was driving the corporate model for the youth of the slums of large cities, were created in the late twentieth century as different movements (which became counterculture), punk, rock, the hippie movement and the various New Age religious groups, which agreed on the need to generate the individual through a change in consciousness that will lead to a new way of living .

The problem was the entry into the excesses of the counter-cultural positions, where especially the punk, claiming various teaching about girlsand, knock, past labor movements, but both were unable to give a renewed proposal libertarian current action, because if it was called in to rebel against punk aesthetic and values ruling class betting on its destruction, never able to define a new life plan, leaving as a musical movement with all its flats, anarchism allowed to survive until its revival in the early new century.

In current times where anarchism comes back as a movement, apart from having new air of protest to the social movement, has been equally diverse positions and services that have made him have a reduced influenceOaxaca 2010